Home arrow General News arrow General News arrow Support grow for motion over nuclear waste concerns
Support grow for motion over nuclear waste concerns PDF Print E-mail
Monday, 23 August 2010


joe_sandwith_councillor.jpgCampaign group Radiation Free Lakeland is backing a west Cumbrian councillor concerned at developments over nuclear waste.

Joe Sandwith (pictured), who represents Seaton on Allerdale Borough Council, is worried that Cumbria is being pushed into a process that is scientifically and democratically flawed.

But his motion for Allerdale to withdraw "expression of interest" has come under fierce pressure from pro nuclear forces. 

For the first time in Allerdale Council's history a motion has been deferred but despite this still stands and will be put forward at the full Council meeting on September 22.

For Radiation Free Lakeland, Marianne Birkby said: “In November 2008 Cumbria County Councillors were denied a vote on what they described as ‘the most important decision the council will ever take.’

“The five hand-picked members of Cumbria County Council's Cabinet pushed the whole of Cumbria into an "expression of interest" for the worst possible option for nuclear waste - geological disposal.

“I was at the meeting and by my reckoning if the "expression of interest" had been allowed a vote Cumbria would have said NO! 

“Interestingly the chairman Tom Clare  said that the unusual decision not to allow a vote had been taken "before the level of discontent about expression of interest was known."

“The government have justified their decision to push for burial of high level nuclear waste by saying : “This is the option being taken in the US at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, where highly radioactive fuel will go underground.

“The Yucca Mountain project involved URS Washington, a key partner in Sellafield's parent body organisation NMP.

“Sounds wonderfully cosy and re-assuring doesn’t it?   But the truth is somewhat different with lawsuits against URS Washington and deep disposal of high level nuclear waste in Yucca Mountain now firmly off the agenda because of contamination risks to the regions water, soil and air. 

“The State of Nevada have been vigorously opposing a nuclear waste geological dump at Yucca Mountain for 20 years and spoke on Radio Cumbria last year urging decision makers here in Cumbria to listen to expert advice from sources other than the industry and pronuclear government departments such as the Department of Energy and Climate Change. 

“This has not happened, despite assurances that experts from, for example, the Nuclear Waste Advisory Associates would be invited to speak to all Cumbrian councillors.  Independent advice appears to be the last thing the pro-geological disposal gang want.

“The geology has not changed since Nirex found it to be the worst possible for a nuclear dump. All that has changed is the Governments headlong rush for new nuclear build - which cannot take place without a designated high level nuclear waste dump.

“Joe Sandwith is the first councillor to stand up and ask that Allerdale withdraws its "expression of interest" - he will not be the last! 

“Unless we say a strong no now and start urging government to look at other safer options for looking after nuclear wastes - Cumbria may find itself forced to accept much more than one high level waste geological disposal dump - all the money in the world would not be enough compensation.”




Bookmark with: what are these?

Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Yahoo!
 
< Prev   Next >